At NCYL, we believe that children are different from adults and should be treated appropriately for their age and ability to change. We advocate for community based services as an alternative to incarceration, and work to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities within the juvenile justice system.
On April 3, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. PST, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) in collaboration with the National Center for Youth in Custody invites you to a two-part Webinar exploring the impact of solitary confinement on youth and efforts to strictly limit isolation in confinement settings: “The Impact of Isolation Practices in Confinement Facilities.”
NCYL's Soros Justice Fellow, Francis V. Guzman is a panelist. Other panelists include advocates, experts, and administrators who have personal and professional experience with the isolation of youth in confinement facilities.
AUSTIN, Texas — Bryan Independent School District's use of school resource officers to issue criminal sanctions for a range of minor student misbehavior unlawfully impacts African-American students, who are "cited" at a rate four times that of other students, according to a complaint filed today with the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR), on behalf of the public interest law center Texas Appleseed and the Brazos County branch of the NAACP.
Attorneys with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the National Center for Youth Law serve as legal counsel to the Complainants.
NCYL Rejects NRA's Call for Armed Security in Schools
The National Center for Youth Law rejects the NRA's call for placing armed security in every school as an extreme and superficial "fix" that is potentially harmful to kids. Research shows that more police in schools does not make kids safer, and, in fact, subjects them to unnecessary scrutiny, harsher discipline, and criminal prosecution for minor misbehavior. We commend President Obama for providing more federal funding to improve school safety and urge him to direct schools to use that money for counselors and psychologists who educate and support children, and not for more police officers. The response to attacks by gunmen with automatic weapons should be to make it much harder to get those weapons. To make our schools truly safer we must address the root causes of violence in our culture and in our schools.
Statement from NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., click here. Statement from American Psychological Association, click here. Statement from The Advancement Project, click here. Statement from Justice Policy Institute, click here. Statement from Nat'l Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, click here. Statement from the National Association of School Psychologists, click here.
The California legislature has passed State Senate Bill 9, the Fair Sentencing for Youth Act! This bill, authored by Sen. Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) allows inmates who were sentenced to life without parole as juveniles the chance to request a resentencing hearing after serving 15 years.
NCYL is working nationally and in California to ban juvenile life without parole. The United States remains the only country to sentence children to life in prison without parole. Approximately 2,500 youths are serving this sentence, some of them for non-homicide offenses. As the public increasingly recognizes the inhumanity of treating adolescents as adults in the application of criminal laws and penalties, the campaign to eliminate youth sentences of life without parole has gained momentum.
The US Supreme Court ruled June 25, 2012 that mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles under 18 violate the 8th Amendment. There are currently 28 states, including California, and the federal government, that allow mandatory life without parole sentences for children.
Sara Kruzan was sentenced to life without parole at age 16. Click on the video below to hear her story.
NCYL is working to reduce the number of children in the Arkansas juvenile justice system and increase funding for community based programs. NCYL and Arkansas’s Division of Youth Services (DYS) have become partners in an effort to improve the system, following a framework for reform outlined in the above report. _____________________
NCYL is partnering with civil advocates, attorneys, and courts to divert mentally ill juvenile offenders away from jails and to the mental health services they need. Between 50 and 90 percent of youth incarcerated in California suffer from some form of mental illness, and about 2,000 youth are incarcerated every day simply because community mental health services are unavailable.
Juvenile mental health courts respond to this crisis by diverting mentally ill youth from juvenile jails to community-based mental health services. They focus on treatment rather than punishment.
In California, NCYL is working to reform the practice of filing charges against juveniles in adult court. We are studying "direct file" cases, conducting case reviews, interviews with youth whose cases were directly filed in adult court, and a data analysis to identify trends and causes for the recent increase in direct files.
New Report Analyzes Prosecution of Youth in CA Adult Court Historically, youth charged with the most serious offenses could be transferred to adult court following a juvenile court hearing to determine if their case was appropriate for adult court. The decision to move a case to adult court rested with the juvenile court judges. However, California Proposition 21, passed in 2000, gave prosecutors authority to file charges directly in adult court without permission from the juvenile court in more serious cases (a process termed “direct file”).
NCYL is working to end the criminalization of youth who misbehave in school. In 2010, Texas issued 420,000 misdemeanor tickets to students for school-based misbehaviors like profanity and truancy. Depending on the jurisdiction, youth who are issued tickets must appear in court, and the tickets are often a youth’s first interaction with the juvenile justice system.
NCYL is also developing a strategy to reduce the use of exclusionary discipline, particularly against youth of color. Using exclusionary discipline to address school misbehavior make it more likely the student will drop out, and be on the streets where they come into contact with the juvenile justice system and later, the criminal justice system. ____________________
Newly released data from the U.S. Department of Education reveals disturbing racial disparities in school discipline. The Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) finds youth of color not only face harsher discipline than White students, they are more often referred to law enforcement, and are more likely to be taught by lower-paid and less experienced teachers.
In the wake of a batch of federal data released earlier this year showing minority children are disproportionately disciplined in schools, experts and policy makers say the reasons are complicated and not so easy to explain. But one thing is clear, they say, changing that is going to require a major shift in school philosophy.