|
FILE NO., COURT, AND DATE FILED
1:03-2535 (N.D. Ga., August 25, 2003)
2003-CV-73072 (Sup. Ct. Fulton County)
CITATIONS
2004 WL 1905331 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 17, 2004) (unreported)
CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW NO.
None
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
David A. Webster Office of David A. Webster 127 Peachtree Street 415 Candler Building Atlanta, GA 30303-1800 (404) 681-3070 Fax: (404) 658-1567 dawebster_alas(at)yahoo.com
Kristin Nelson Verrill Atlanta Legal Aid Society 32 Waddell Street Marietta, GA 30090-2900 (770) 528-2565 Fax: (770) 528-2574 knverrill(at)atlantalegalaid.org
Richard Allen Horder Kilpatrick Stockton LLP 1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 (404) 815-6500 Fax: (404) 815-6655 rhorder(at)kilpatrickstockton.com
ISSUES
Plaintiff, a grandmother seeking Adoption Assistance Program (AAP) payments for her two granddaughters, filed this lawsuit against the Georgia Department of Human Resources (DHR) and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Plaintiff alleged that HHS violated the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
552, when it promulgated its 2001 Policy Announcement (ACYF-PA-01-01) without providing the appropriate notice and comment period. The 2001 policy announcement overturned previous HHS policy and required that a child demonstrate AFDC eligibility in the home from which the child was removed. Plaintiff sought declaratory relief and the reversal of the administrative law decision.
HISTORY AND STATUS
After losing a state administrative appeal, plaintiff filed this suit in state court. On August 25, 2003, HHS removed the case to federal court. On September 9, 2003, HHS filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the policy announcements were exempt from notice and comment requirements. Defendants also argued that because the policy announcements simply interpret an existing statute they are neither arbitrary nor capricious. The hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss was held on June 2, 2004.
The court subsequently denied the motion and reversed the ALJ's decision denying plaintiff's claim for adoption assistance benefits. The court also declared invalid that portion of the Secretary's Policy Announcement ACYF-CB-PA-01-01 dated January 23, 2001, that required children who were otherwise eligible for receiving adoption assistance benefits to demonstrate AFDC eligibility in the home from which they were removed. Defendants appealed the decision, but later dismissed their appeal with prejudice.
|